11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large cars / RS 3 vs M3

Audi RS 3 vs BMW M3

Two large cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Audi RS 3 leads on 3, the BMW M3 on 2.

Where each one leads

Audi RS 3

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Audi RS 3 uses 10.3 l/100 km, the 2026 BMW M3 12.6.
  • New Audi RS 3 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 206 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 211 for the BMW M3 in 2022.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Audi RS 3 uses 11.1 l/100 km on the road, the BMW M3 13.1.

BMW M3

  • Against cars of the same year, the BMW M3 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 64% less often than average) than the Audi RS 3 (fails 44% less often than average).
  • Fewer BMW M3 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (7.3% against 8.9%).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Audi RS 3BMW M3
Model years in the US safety record2017–20261988–2025
New cars registered in Europe23,891 (2012–2022)23,515 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom—27,874
On the road in the Netherlands1,5332,842
In traffic in Finland125347

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Audi RS 3BMW M3
UK MOT first-time pass rate—85%
… against cars of the same age—+34%
New York safety inspections failed0.5%0.6%
… against cars of the same year−44%−64%
Illogical odometer records (NL)8.9%7.3%
US owner complaints22444
Most complaints aboutEnginePower train
Model year with most complaints2018 (13)2008 (82)
US recall campaigns726
Manufacturer service bulletins2,9401,633
NHTSA defect investigations325

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Audi RS 3BMW M3
Official combined fuel use, Canada10.3 l/100 km (2026)12.6 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol11.1 l/100 km13.1 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—10.0 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe206 g/km211 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe294 kW (394 hp)337 kW (452 hp)
Average mass in running order1,646 kg1,850 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€98,675€124,668
Average odometer in Finland96,000 km151,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).