11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / TT vs Eclipse

Audi TT vs Mitsubishi Eclipse

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Audi TT leads on 3, the Mitsubishi Eclipse on 1.

Where each one leads

Audi TT

  • Against cars of the same age, the Audi TT comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 13% more often than average) than the Mitsubishi Eclipse (passes 3% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Audi TT comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 24% less often than average) than the Mitsubishi Eclipse (fails 2% more often than average).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2023 Audi TT uses 9.4 l/100 km, the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse 10.1.

Mitsubishi Eclipse

  • New Mitsubishi Eclipse cars registered in Europe in 2021 average 114 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 161 for the Audi TT in 2022.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Audi TTMitsubishi Eclipse
Model years in the US safety record1999–20241986–2022
New cars registered in Europe78,602 (2010–2022)8,769 (2011–2021)
Licensed in the United Kingdom60,77211,822
On the road in the Netherlands8,176—
In traffic in Finland1,718—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Audi TTMitsubishi Eclipse
UK MOT first-time pass rate76%87%
… against cars of the same age+13%+3%
New York safety inspections failed1.6%2.3%
… against cars of the same year−24%+2%
Illogical odometer records (NL)10.0%—
US owner complaints3192,135
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemPower train
Model year with most complaints2001 (120)2000 (308)
US recall campaigns1230
Manufacturer service bulletins7,5561,270
NHTSA defect investigations239

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Audi TTMitsubishi Eclipse
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.4 l/100 km (2023)10.1 l/100 km (2012)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol8.4 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe161 g/km114 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe159 kW (213 hp)96 kW (129 hp)
Average mass in running order1,385 kg1,751 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€52,209—
Average odometer in Finland219,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).