Where each one leads
Chevrolet Venture
- On Canada's official test the most frugal 2005 Chevrolet Venture uses 12.2 l/100 km, the 2003 Ford Windstar 12.9.
Ford Windstar
- Against cars of the same year, the Ford Windstar comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 33% more often than average) than the Chevrolet Venture (fails 55% more often than average).
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Chevrolet Venture | Ford Windstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | 1988–2005 | 1985–2005 |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Chevrolet Venture | Ford Windstar | |
|---|---|---|
| New York safety inspections failed | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| … against cars of the same year | +55% | +33% |
| US owner complaints | 2,336 | 14,158 |
| Most complaints about | Engine and engine cooling | Engine and engine cooling |
| Model year with most complaints | 1997 (432) | 1995 (3,326) |
| US recall campaigns | 18 | 33 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | 2,871 | 1,693 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | 30 | 81 |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Chevrolet Venture | Ford Windstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | 12.2 l/100 km (2005) | 12.9 l/100 km (2003) |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).