Where each one leads
Ford F-250
- Against cars of the same year, the Ford F-250 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 51% less often than average) than the Lincoln Mark LT (fails 10% less often than average).
- On Canada's official test the most frugal 1999 Ford F-250 uses 16.4 l/100 km, the 2008 Lincoln Mark LT 16.7.
Lincoln Mark LT
Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Ford F-250 | Lincoln Mark LT | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | 1989–2014 | 2005–2008 |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Ford F-250 | Lincoln Mark LT | |
|---|---|---|
| New York safety inspections failed | 0.8% | 2.2% |
| … against cars of the same year | −51% | −10% |
| US owner complaints | 4,267 | 41 |
| Most complaints about | Steering | Power train |
| Model year with most complaints | 1999 (581) | 2006 (31) |
| US recall campaigns | 54 | 4 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | 1,892 | 80 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | 65 | 2 |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Ford F-250 | Lincoln Mark LT | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | 16.4 l/100 km (1999) | 16.7 l/100 km (2008) |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).