Where each one leads
Jeep Commander
Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.
Volvo XC90
- Against cars of the same year, the Volvo XC90 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 32% less often than average) than the Jeep Commander (fails 12% more often than average).
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Jeep Commander | Volvo XC90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | 2005–2024 | 2003–2025 |
| New cars registered in Europe | — | 244,724 (2010–2022) |
| Licensed in the United Kingdom | 476 | 93,504 |
| On the road in the Netherlands | — | 32,495 |
| In traffic in Finland | — | 218 |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Jeep Commander | Volvo XC90 | |
|---|---|---|
| UK MOT first-time pass rate | — | 72% |
| … against cars of the same age | — | +2% |
| New York safety inspections failed | 2.7% | 0.8% |
| … against cars of the same year | +12% | −32% |
| Illogical odometer records (NL) | — | 5.2% |
| US owner complaints | 2,752 | 1,534 |
| Most complaints about | Electrical system | Electrical system |
| Model year with most complaints | 2006 (1,635) | 2004 (462) |
| US recall campaigns | 13 | 35 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | 419 | 5,739 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | 9 | 14 |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Safety
| Jeep Commander | Volvo XC90 | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall rating | — | 5★ (2027) |
NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Jeep Commander | Volvo XC90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | — | 10.4 l/100 km (2026) |
| Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid | — | 8.3 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid | — | 10.6 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, diesel | — | 8.4 l/100 km |
| Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe | — | 102 g/km |
| Average power of new cars in Europe | — | 205 kW (275 hp) |
| Average mass in running order | — | 2,239 kg |
| Dutch list price when new (median) | — | €88,925 |
| Average odometer in Finland | — | 258,000 km |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).