11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Compact cars / A3 vs XCeed

Audi A3 vs Kia XCeed

compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Audi A3 leads on 4, the Kia XCeed on 1.

Where each one leads

Audi A3

  • Against cars of the same age, the Audi A3 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 6% more often than average) than the Kia XCeed (passes 1% more often than average).
  • New Audi A3 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 105 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 109 for the Kia XCeed in 2022.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol hybrid Audi A3 uses 6.6 l/100 km on the road, the Kia XCeed 7.2.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Audi A3 uses 6.7 l/100 km on the road, the Kia XCeed 7.1.

Kia XCeed

  • Fewer Kia XCeed cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.9% against 3.2%).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Audi A3Kia XCeed
Model years in the US safety record1997–2026—
New cars registered in Europe1,602,788 (2010–2022)138,285 (2019–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom452,61541,197
On the road in the Netherlands86,1516,455
In traffic in Finland22,2902,463

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Audi A3Kia XCeed
UK MOT first-time pass rate75%88%
… against cars of the same age+6%+1%
New York safety inspections failed1.3%—
… against cars of the same year−21%—
Illogical odometer records (NL)3.2%1.9%
US owner complaints734—
Most complaints aboutAir bags—
Model year with most complaints2006 (123)—
US recall campaigns20—
Manufacturer service bulletins10,205—
NHTSA defect investigations16—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Audi A3Kia XCeed
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2020)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Audi A3Kia XCeed
Official combined fuel use, Canada8.5 l/100 km (2026)—
Real-world use in Europe, diesel5.6 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid6.6 l/100 km7.2 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol6.7 l/100 km7.1 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe105 g/km109 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe102 kW (137 hp)98 kW (131 hp)
Average mass in running order1,464 kg1,447 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€38,051€36,350
Average odometer in Finland186,000 km62,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).