11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / TT vs Crossfire

Audi TT vs Chrysler Crossfire

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Audi TT leads on 2, the Chrysler Crossfire on 2.

Where each one leads

Audi TT

  • Fewer Audi TT cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (10.0% against 13.8%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2023 Audi TT uses 9.4 l/100 km, the 2008 Chrysler Crossfire 11.1.

Chrysler Crossfire

  • Against cars of the same age, the Chrysler Crossfire comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 20% more often than average) than the Audi TT (passes 13% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Chrysler Crossfire comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 31% less often than average) than the Audi TT (fails 24% less often than average).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Audi TTChrysler Crossfire
Model years in the US safety record1999–20242004–2008
New cars registered in Europe78,602 (2010–2022)—
Licensed in the United Kingdom60,7721,535
On the road in the Netherlands8,176547
In traffic in Finland1,718—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Audi TTChrysler Crossfire
UK MOT first-time pass rate76%67%
… against cars of the same age+13%+20%
New York safety inspections failed1.6%1.6%
… against cars of the same year−24%−31%
Illogical odometer records (NL)10.0%13.8%
US owner complaints319404
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemStructure
Model year with most complaints2001 (120)2005 (189)
US recall campaigns121
Manufacturer service bulletins7,556229
NHTSA defect investigations22

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Audi TTChrysler Crossfire
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.4 l/100 km (2023)11.1 l/100 km (2008)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol8.4 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe161 g/km—
Average power of new cars in Europe159 kW (213 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,385 kg—
Dutch list price when new (median)€52,209€53,921
Average odometer in Finland219,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).