11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Crossfire vs Eos

Chrysler Crossfire vs Volkswagen Eos

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Chrysler Crossfire leads on 2, the Volkswagen Eos on 2.

Where each one leads

Chrysler Crossfire

  • Against cars of the same age, the Chrysler Crossfire comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 20% more often than average) than the Volkswagen Eos (passes 9% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Chrysler Crossfire comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 31% less often than average) than the Volkswagen Eos (fails 15% less often than average).

Volkswagen Eos

  • Fewer Volkswagen Eos cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (4.3% against 13.8%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2015 Volkswagen Eos uses 9.5 l/100 km, the 2008 Chrysler Crossfire 11.1.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Chrysler CrossfireVolkswagen Eos
Model years in the US safety record2004–20082005–2017
New cars registered in Europe—37,265 (2010–2020)
Licensed in the United Kingdom1,5359,950
On the road in the Netherlands5473,438
In traffic in Finland—184

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Chrysler CrossfireVolkswagen Eos
UK MOT first-time pass rate67%65%
… against cars of the same age+20%+9%
New York safety inspections failed1.6%2.0%
… against cars of the same year−31%−15%
Illogical odometer records (NL)13.8%4.3%
US owner complaints404425
Most complaints aboutStructureAir bags
Model year with most complaints2005 (189)2012 (94)
US recall campaigns17
Manufacturer service bulletins2297,676
NHTSA defect investigations215

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Chrysler CrossfireVolkswagen Eos
Official combined fuel use, Canada11.1 l/100 km (2008)9.5 l/100 km (2015)
Average power of new cars in Europe—93 kW (124 hp)
Average mass in running order—1,574 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€53,921€40,496
Average odometer in Finland—190,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).