11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large cars / M3 vs XJR

BMW M3 vs Jaguar XJR

Two large cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the BMW M3 leads on 4, the Jaguar XJR on 1.

Where each one leads

BMW M3

  • Against cars of the same age, the BMW M3 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 34% more often than average) than the Jaguar XJR (passes 22% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the BMW M3 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 64% less often than average) than the Jaguar XJR (fails 27% less often than average).
  • Fewer BMW M3 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (7.3% against 10.2%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 BMW M3 uses 12.6 l/100 km, the 2019 Jaguar XJR 13.3.

Jaguar XJR

  • New Jaguar XJR cars registered in Europe in 2021 average 139 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 211 for the BMW M3 in 2022.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

BMW M3Jaguar XJR
Model years in the US safety record1988–20251995–2014
New cars registered in Europe23,515 (2010–2022)1,238 (2010–2021)
Licensed in the United Kingdom27,874—
On the road in the Netherlands2,842203
In traffic in Finland347—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

BMW M3Jaguar XJR
UK MOT first-time pass rate85%72%
… against cars of the same age+34%+22%
New York safety inspections failed0.6%1.5%
… against cars of the same year−64%−27%
Illogical odometer records (NL)7.3%10.2%
US owner complaints44432
Most complaints aboutPower trainEngine and engine cooling
Model year with most complaints2008 (82)1998 (9)
US recall campaigns26—
Manufacturer service bulletins1,633201
NHTSA defect investigations25—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

BMW M3Jaguar XJR
Official combined fuel use, Canada12.6 l/100 km (2026)13.3 l/100 km (2019)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol13.1 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid10.0 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe211 g/km139 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe337 kW (452 hp)150 kW (201 hp)
Average mass in running order1,850 kg1,754 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€124,668€106,278
Average odometer in Finland151,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).