11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large SUVs / Explorer vs Range Rover

Ford Explorer vs Land Rover Range Rover

Two large SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Ford Explorer leads on 3, the Land Rover Range Rover on 1.

Where each one leads

Ford Explorer

  • Fewer Ford Explorer cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.0% against 7.6%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Ford Explorer uses 10.4 l/100 km, the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover 12.6.
  • New Ford Explorer cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 75 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 206 for the Land Rover Range Rover in 2022.

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Against cars of the same year, the Land Rover Range Rover comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 53% less often than average) than the Ford Explorer (fails 20% less often than average).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford ExplorerLand Rover Range Rover
Model years in the US safety record1984–20271987–2026
New cars registered in Europe10,009 (2010–2022)130,610 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom16,80090,503
On the road in the Netherlands7,4177,449
In traffic in Finland1,617—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford ExplorerLand Rover Range Rover
UK MOT first-time pass rate—78%
… against cars of the same age—+12%
New York safety inspections failed1.2%0.6%
… against cars of the same year−20%−53%
Illogical odometer records (NL)1.0%7.6%
US owner complaints34,627969
Most complaints aboutPower trainPower train
Model year with most complaints2002 (3,295)2003 (97)
US recall campaigns14275
Manufacturer service bulletins5,0358,900
NHTSA defect investigations15532

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford ExplorerLand Rover Range Rover
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2027)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford ExplorerLand Rover Range Rover
Official combined fuel use, Canada10.4 l/100 km (2026)12.6 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid—10.3 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol—15.4 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—13.1 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel—10.3 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe75 g/km206 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe267 kW (358 hp)298 kW (400 hp)
Average mass in running order2,547 kg2,575 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€77,709€164,190
Average odometer in Finland86,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).