11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large SUVs / Tourneo vs XC90

Ford Tourneo vs Volvo XC90

Two large SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Ford Tourneo leads on 0, the Volvo XC90 on 5.

Where each one leads

Ford Tourneo

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Volvo XC90

  • Against cars of the same age, the Volvo XC90 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 2% more often than average) than the Ford Tourneo (passes 7% less often than average).
  • Fewer Volvo XC90 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (5.2% against 6.9%).
  • New Volvo XC90 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 102 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 211 for the Ford Tourneo in 2022.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel Volvo XC90 uses 8.4 l/100 km on the road, the Ford Tourneo 9.4.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel hybrid Volvo XC90 uses 8.3 l/100 km on the road, the Ford Tourneo 8.8.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford TourneoVolvo XC90
Model years in the US safety record—2003–2025
New cars registered in Europe165,573 (2010–2022)244,724 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom46,26993,504
On the road in the Netherlands1,81632,495
In traffic in Finland1,289218

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford TourneoVolvo XC90
UK MOT first-time pass rate77%72%
… against cars of the same age−7%+2%
New York safety inspections failed—0.8%
… against cars of the same year—−32%
Illogical odometer records (NL)6.9%5.2%
US owner complaints—1,534
Most complaints about—Electrical system
Model year with most complaints—2004 (462)
US recall campaigns—35
Manufacturer service bulletins—5,739
NHTSA defect investigations—14

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford TourneoVolvo XC90
NHTSA overall rating—5★ (2027)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford TourneoVolvo XC90
Official combined fuel use, Canada—10.4 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel9.4 l/100 km8.4 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid8.8 l/100 km8.3 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol7.6 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—10.6 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe211 g/km102 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe114 kW (154 hp)205 kW (275 hp)
Average mass in running order2,362 kg2,239 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€44,835€88,925
Average odometer in Finland176,000 km258,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).