Where each one leads
Ford Tourneo
- Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Ford Tourneo uses 7.6 l/100 km on the road, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 10.3.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- Against cars of the same age, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 7% more often than average) than the Ford Tourneo (passes 7% less often than average).
- Fewer Land Rover Range Rover Evoque cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (5.7% against 6.9%).
- New Land Rover Range Rover Evoque cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 138 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 211 for the Ford Tourneo in 2022.
- Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 7.5 l/100 km on the road, the Ford Tourneo 9.4.
- Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel hybrid Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 7.7 l/100 km on the road, the Ford Tourneo 8.8.
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Ford Tourneo | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | — | 2011–2026 |
| New cars registered in Europe | 165,573 (2010–2022) | 360,203 (2011–2022) |
| Licensed in the United Kingdom | 46,269 | 226,984 |
| On the road in the Netherlands | 1,816 | 12,404 |
| In traffic in Finland | 1,289 | — |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Ford Tourneo | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| UK MOT first-time pass rate | 77% | 84% |
| … against cars of the same age | −7% | +7% |
| New York safety inspections failed | — | 1.0% |
| … against cars of the same year | — | −33% |
| Illogical odometer records (NL) | 6.9% | 5.7% |
| US owner complaints | — | 393 |
| Most complaints about | — | Engine |
| Model year with most complaints | — | 2015 (64) |
| US recall campaigns | — | 26 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | — | 5,278 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | — | 14 |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Ford Tourneo | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | — | 10.5 l/100 km (2026) |
| Real-world use in Europe, diesel | 9.4 l/100 km | 7.5 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid | 8.8 l/100 km | 7.7 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol | 7.6 l/100 km | 10.3 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid | — | 10.6 l/100 km |
| Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe | 211 g/km | 138 g/km |
| Average power of new cars in Europe | 114 kW (154 hp) | 139 kW (187 hp) |
| Average mass in running order | 2,362 kg | 2,027 kg |
| Dutch list price when new (median) | €44,835 | €72,976 |
| Average odometer in Finland | 176,000 km | — |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).