11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Mid-size cars / X-Type vs Passat

Jaguar X-Type vs Volkswagen Passat

Two mid-size cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Jaguar X-Type leads on 1, the Volkswagen Passat on 2, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Jaguar X-Type

  • Against cars of the same year, the Jaguar X-Type comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 7% less often than average) than the Volkswagen Passat (fails 12% more often than average).

Volkswagen Passat

  • Fewer Volkswagen Passat cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (3.8% against 7.8%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2022 Volkswagen Passat uses 8.3 l/100 km, the 2008 Jaguar X-Type 12.9.

Too close to call: MOT pass rate against cars of the same age.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Jaguar X-TypeVolkswagen Passat
Model years in the US safety record2001–20081988–2025
New cars registered in Europe—1,972,396 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom15,878178,867
On the road in the Netherlands1,20561,953
In traffic in Finland54850,018
Generations on record—6

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Jaguar X-TypeVolkswagen Passat
UK MOT first-time pass rate58%71%
… against cars of the same age+1%+3%
New York safety inspections failed2.1%2.3%
… against cars of the same year−7%+12%
Illogical odometer records (NL)7.8%3.8%
US owner complaints3157,707
Most complaints aboutPower trainAir bags
Model year with most complaints2002 (116)2013 (749)
US recall campaigns354
Manufacturer service bulletins48314,721
NHTSA defect investigations—79

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Jaguar X-TypeVolkswagen Passat
NHTSA overall rating—4★ (2022)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Jaguar X-TypeVolkswagen Passat
Official combined fuel use, Canada12.9 l/100 km (2008)8.3 l/100 km (2022)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel—6.0 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol—7.3 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—6.4 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe—122 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe—117 kW (157 hp)
Average mass in running order—1,606 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€54,444€44,330
Average odometer in Finland238,000 km238,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).