11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Compact cars / Lancer Sportback vs Corolla

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback vs Toyota Corolla

Two compact cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 3 like-for-like measures: the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback leads on 0, the Toyota Corolla on 3.

Where each one leads

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Toyota Corolla

  • Against cars of the same year, the Toyota Corolla comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 6% less often than average) than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback (fails 56% more often than average).
  • NHTSA rates the 2025 Toyota Corolla at 5 of 5 stars, the 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback at 4.
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Toyota Corolla uses 6.7 l/100 km, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 8.4.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Mitsubishi Lancer SportbackToyota Corolla
Model years in the US safety record2004–20171981–2026
New cars registered in Europe—604,655 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom—154,285
On the road in the Netherlands—78,090
In traffic in Finland—107,955
Generations on record—5

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Mitsubishi Lancer SportbackToyota Corolla
UK MOT first-time pass rate—71%
… against cars of the same age—+4%
New York safety inspections failed3.8%1.7%
… against cars of the same year+56%−6%
Illogical odometer records (NL)—2.6%
US owner complaints1211,746
Most complaints aboutUnknown or otherAir bags
Model year with most complaints2004 (8)2009 (1,459)
US recall campaigns653
Manufacturer service bulletins6005,686
NHTSA defect investigations458

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Mitsubishi Lancer SportbackToyota Corolla
NHTSA overall rating4★ (2014)5★ (2025)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Mitsubishi Lancer SportbackToyota Corolla
Official combined fuel use, Canada8.4 l/100 km (2017)6.7 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—5.2 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol—6.8 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe—112 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe—83 kW (111 hp)
Average mass in running order—1,436 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)—€27,800
Average odometer in Finland—212,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).