11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large SUVs / Macan vs XC60

Porsche Macan vs Volvo XC60

Two large SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 6 like-for-like measures: the Porsche Macan leads on 3, the Volvo XC60 on 3.

Where each one leads

Porsche Macan

  • Against cars of the same age, the Porsche Macan comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 12% more often than average) than the Volvo XC60 (passes 4% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Porsche Macan comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 66% less often than average) than the Volvo XC60 (fails 42% less often than average).
  • Fewer Porsche Macan cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.3% against 2.8%).

Volvo XC60

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Volvo XC60 uses 9.0 l/100 km, the 2026 Porsche Macan 11.0.
  • New Volvo XC60 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 106 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 224 for the Porsche Macan in 2022.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Volvo XC60 uses 9.5 l/100 km on the road, the Porsche Macan 11.2.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Porsche MacanVolvo XC60
Model years in the US safety record2014–20252008–2025
New cars registered in Europe48,580 (2014–2022)786,285 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom53,682151,191
On the road in the Netherlands6,73561,625
In traffic in Finland1493,844

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Porsche MacanVolvo XC60
UK MOT first-time pass rate92%80%
… against cars of the same age+12%+4%
New York safety inspections failed0.4%0.7%
… against cars of the same year−66%−42%
Illogical odometer records (NL)1.3%2.8%
US owner complaints241654
Most complaints aboutAir bagsElectrical system
Model year with most complaints2017 (63)2022 (75)
US recall campaigns1036
Manufacturer service bulletins3,4963,949
NHTSA defect investigations45

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Porsche MacanVolvo XC60
NHTSA overall rating—5★ (2027)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Porsche MacanVolvo XC60
Official combined fuel use, Canada11.0 l/100 km (2026)9.0 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol11.2 l/100 km9.5 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid—7.2 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—9.1 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel—7.4 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe224 g/km106 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe195 kW (261 hp)171 kW (229 hp)
Average mass in running order1,940 kg2,030 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€113,518€69,959
Average odometer in Finland81,000 km222,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).