11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / TT vs Celica

Audi TT vs Toyota Celica

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Audi TT leads on 3, the Toyota Celica on 1.

Where each one leads

Audi TT

  • Against cars of the same age, the Audi TT comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 13% more often than average) than the Toyota Celica (passes 4% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Audi TT comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 24% less often than average) than the Toyota Celica (fails 33% more often than average).
  • Fewer Audi TT cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (10.0% against 10.2%).

Toyota Celica

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2005 Toyota Celica uses 8.5 l/100 km, the 2023 Audi TT 9.4.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Audi TTToyota Celica
Model years in the US safety record1999–20241981–2006
New cars registered in Europe78,602 (2010–2022)—
Licensed in the United Kingdom60,7727,198
On the road in the Netherlands8,1762,581
In traffic in Finland1,718668

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Audi TTToyota Celica
UK MOT first-time pass rate76%61%
… against cars of the same age+13%+4%
New York safety inspections failed1.6%2.2%
… against cars of the same year−24%+33%
Illogical odometer records (NL)10.0%10.2%
US owner complaints319413
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemAir bags
Model year with most complaints2001 (120)2000 (106)
US recall campaigns127
Manufacturer service bulletins7,5561,115
NHTSA defect investigations212

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Audi TTToyota Celica
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.4 l/100 km (2023)8.5 l/100 km (2005)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol8.4 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe161 g/km—
Average power of new cars in Europe159 kW (213 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,385 kg—
Dutch list price when new (median)€52,209€39,253
Average odometer in Finland219,000 km247,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).