11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Celica vs Beetle

Toyota Celica vs Volkswagen Beetle

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Toyota Celica leads on 1, the Volkswagen Beetle on 3.

Where each one leads

Toyota Celica

  • Against cars of the same age, the Toyota Celica comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 4% more often than average) than the Volkswagen Beetle (passes 8% less often than average).

Volkswagen Beetle

  • Against cars of the same year, the Volkswagen Beetle comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 17% less often than average) than the Toyota Celica (fails 33% more often than average).
  • Fewer Volkswagen Beetle cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (4.8% against 10.2%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2019 Volkswagen Beetle uses 8.1 l/100 km, the 2005 Toyota Celica 8.5.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Toyota CelicaVolkswagen Beetle
Model years in the US safety record1981–20061998–2019
New cars registered in Europe—178,641 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom7,19839,933
On the road in the Netherlands2,5815,221
In traffic in Finland6681,348

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Toyota CelicaVolkswagen Beetle
UK MOT first-time pass rate61%58%
… against cars of the same age+4%−8%
New York safety inspections failed2.2%1.7%
… against cars of the same year+33%−17%
Illogical odometer records (NL)10.2%4.8%
US owner complaints4132,588
Most complaints aboutAir bagsPower train
Model year with most complaints2000 (106)2004 (349)
US recall campaigns724
Manufacturer service bulletins1,11510,891
NHTSA defect investigations1215

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Toyota CelicaVolkswagen Beetle
NHTSA overall rating—5★ (2017)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Toyota CelicaVolkswagen Beetle
Official combined fuel use, Canada8.5 l/100 km (2005)8.1 l/100 km (2019)
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe—152 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe—162 kW (217 hp)
Average mass in running order—1,276 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€39,253€33,573
Average odometer in Finland247,000 km135,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).