11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Z4 vs Celica

BMW Z4 vs Toyota Celica

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the BMW Z4 leads on 3, the Toyota Celica on 0, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

BMW Z4

  • Against cars of the same age, the BMW Z4 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 20% more often than average) than the Toyota Celica (passes 4% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the BMW Z4 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 51% less often than average) than the Toyota Celica (fails 33% more often than average).
  • Fewer BMW Z4 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (4.2% against 10.2%).

Toyota Celica

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Too close to call: official combined fuel use, Canada (l/100 km).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

BMW Z4Toyota Celica
Model years in the US safety record2002–20251981–2006
New cars registered in Europe60,724 (2010–2022)—
Licensed in the United Kingdom32,4587,198
On the road in the Netherlands5,2992,581
In traffic in Finland773668

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

BMW Z4Toyota Celica
UK MOT first-time pass rate77%61%
… against cars of the same age+20%+4%
New York safety inspections failed1.0%2.2%
… against cars of the same year−51%+33%
Illogical odometer records (NL)4.2%10.2%
US owner complaints1,282413
Most complaints aboutSteeringAir bags
Model year with most complaints2003 (414)2000 (106)
US recall campaigns287
Manufacturer service bulletins1,8171,115
NHTSA defect investigations912

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

BMW Z4Toyota Celica
Official combined fuel use, Canada8.4 l/100 km (2026)8.5 l/100 km (2005)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol8.9 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe170 g/km—
Average power of new cars in Europe193 kW (259 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,554 kg—
Dutch list price when new (median)€70,203€39,253
Average odometer in Finland136,000 km247,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).