11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large SUVs / X3 vs Wrangler

BMW X3 vs Jeep Wrangler

Two large SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 6 like-for-like measures: the BMW X3 leads on 5, the Jeep Wrangler on 1.

Where each one leads

BMW X3

  • Against cars of the same age, the BMW X3 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 6% more often than average) than the Jeep Wrangler (passes 2% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the BMW X3 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 32% less often than average) than the Jeep Wrangler (fails 25% less often than average).
  • Fewer BMW X3 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (2.2% against 22.6%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 BMW X3 uses 8.1 l/100 km, the 2026 Jeep Wrangler 11.0.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol BMW X3 uses 10.8 l/100 km on the road, the Jeep Wrangler 12.4.

Jeep Wrangler

  • New Jeep Wrangler cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 117 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 125 for the BMW X3 in 2022.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

BMW X3Jeep Wrangler
Model years in the US safety record2004–20261984–2026
New cars registered in Europe583,466 (2010–2022)71,721 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom123,9647,374
On the road in the Netherlands25,6504,168
In traffic in Finland4,293—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

BMW X3Jeep Wrangler
UK MOT first-time pass rate80%76%
… against cars of the same age+6%+2%
New York safety inspections failed0.8%1.1%
… against cars of the same year−32%−25%
Illogical odometer records (NL)2.2%22.6%
US owner complaints2,01516,046
Most complaints aboutEngineSteering
Model year with most complaints2013 (226)2018 (1,827)
US recall campaigns6092
Manufacturer service bulletins3,8686,389
NHTSA defect investigations17144

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

BMW X3Jeep Wrangler
NHTSA overall rating4★ (2026)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

BMW X3Jeep Wrangler
Official combined fuel use, Canada8.1 l/100 km (2026)11.0 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid7.3 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid9.4 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol10.8 l/100 km12.4 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel7.6 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe125 g/km117 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe157 kW (210 hp)201 kW (269 hp)
Average mass in running order1,985 kg2,328 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€75,236€85,344
Average odometer in Finland237,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).