11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Compact cars / Focus vs Lancer

Ford Focus vs Mitsubishi Lancer

compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 6 like-for-like measures: the Ford Focus leads on 4, the Mitsubishi Lancer on 2.

Where each one leads

Ford Focus

  • Against cars of the same year, the Ford Focus comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 36% more often than average) than the Mitsubishi Lancer (fails 42% more often than average).
  • NHTSA rates the 2018 Ford Focus at 5 of 5 stars, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer at 4.
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2018 Ford Focus uses 7.0 l/100 km, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer 7.9.
  • New Ford Focus cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 124 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 140 for the Mitsubishi Lancer in 2022.

Mitsubishi Lancer

  • Against cars of the same age, the Mitsubishi Lancer comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 10% more often than average) than the Ford Focus (passes 1% less often than average).
  • Fewer Mitsubishi Lancer cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (2.3% against 3.2%).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford FocusMitsubishi Lancer
Model years in the US safety record1999–20181996–2017
New cars registered in Europe2,529,698 (2010–2022)46,274 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom895,5316,331
On the road in the Netherlands159,2793,729
In traffic in Finland57,5462,580

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford FocusMitsubishi Lancer
UK MOT first-time pass rate68%65%
… against cars of the same age−1%+10%
New York safety inspections failed3.0%3.2%
… against cars of the same year+36%+42%
Illogical odometer records (NL)3.2%2.3%
US owner complaints22,105865
Most complaints aboutPower trainPower train
Model year with most complaints2012 (3,770)2003 (199)
US recall campaigns3615
Manufacturer service bulletins1,9691,335
NHTSA defect investigations6010

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford FocusMitsubishi Lancer
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2018)4★ (2017)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford FocusMitsubishi Lancer
Official combined fuel use, Canada7.0 l/100 km (2018)7.9 l/100 km (2017)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid6.7 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, diesel5.5 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol7.6 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe124 g/km140 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe96 kW (129 hp)150 kW (201 hp)
Average mass in running order1,414 kg1,350 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€27,290€20,298
Average odometer in Finland192,000 km220,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).