11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Mustang vs F-Type

Ford Mustang vs Jaguar F-Type

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Ford Mustang leads on 1, the Jaguar F-Type on 4.

Where each one leads

Ford Mustang

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Ford Mustang uses 9.1 l/100 km, the 2024 Jaguar F-Type 12.1.

Jaguar F-Type

  • Against cars of the same age, the Jaguar F-Type comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 15% more often than average) than the Ford Mustang (passes 6% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Jaguar F-Type comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 54% less often than average) than the Ford Mustang (fails 37% less often than average).
  • Fewer Jaguar F-Type cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (5.2% against 68.9%).
  • New Jaguar F-Type cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 227 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 266 for the Ford Mustang in 2022.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford MustangJaguar F-Type
Model years in the US safety record1981–20262013–2024
New cars registered in Europe55,766 (2010–2022)31,658 (2013–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom12,01615,088
On the road in the Netherlands7,283934
In traffic in Finland1,553—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford MustangJaguar F-Type
UK MOT first-time pass rate83%91%
… against cars of the same age+6%+15%
New York safety inspections failed1.1%0.7%
… against cars of the same year−37%−54%
Illogical odometer records (NL)68.9%5.2%
US owner complaints9,23136
Most complaints aboutAir bagsEngine
Model year with most complaints2005 (705)2016 (11)
US recall campaigns8114
Manufacturer service bulletins3,3733,694
NHTSA defect investigations95—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford MustangJaguar F-Type
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2027)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford MustangJaguar F-Type
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.1 l/100 km (2026)12.1 l/100 km (2024)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol13.9 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe266 g/km227 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe332 kW (445 hp)269 kW (361 hp)
Average mass in running order1,851 kg1,764 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€85,667€118,524
Average odometer in Finland92,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).