11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Mustang vs XJS

Ford Mustang vs Jaguar XJS

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Ford Mustang leads on 1, the Jaguar XJS on 2, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Ford Mustang

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Ford Mustang uses 9.1 l/100 km, the 1996 Jaguar XJS 12.9.

Jaguar XJS

  • Against cars of the same age, the Jaguar XJS comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 13% more often than average) than the Ford Mustang (passes 6% more often than average).
  • Fewer Jaguar XJS cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (35.7% against 68.9%).

Too close to call: new York safety inspections failed, against cars of the same year.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford MustangJaguar XJS
Model years in the US safety record1981–20261981–2002
New cars registered in Europe55,766 (2010–2022)—
Licensed in the United Kingdom12,016—
On the road in the Netherlands7,283923
In traffic in Finland1,553—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford MustangJaguar XJS
UK MOT first-time pass rate83%78%
… against cars of the same age+6%+13%
New York safety inspections failed1.1%1.0%
… against cars of the same year−37%−38%
Illogical odometer records (NL)68.9%35.7%
US owner complaints9,23182
Most complaints aboutAir bagsFuel system, gasoline
Model year with most complaints2005 (705)1990 (15)
US recall campaigns8112
Manufacturer service bulletins3,373426
NHTSA defect investigations9512

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford MustangJaguar XJS
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2027)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford MustangJaguar XJS
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.1 l/100 km (2026)12.9 l/100 km (1996)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol13.9 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe266 g/km—
Average power of new cars in Europe332 kW (445 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,851 kg—
Dutch list price when new (median)€85,667€88,635
Average odometer in Finland92,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).