Where each one leads
Ford Mustang
- On Canada's official test the most frugal 2026 Ford Mustang uses 9.1 l/100 km, the 2014 Jaguar XK 12.6.
Jaguar XK
- Against cars of the same age, the Jaguar XK comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 31% more often than average) than the Ford Mustang (passes 6% more often than average).
- Against cars of the same year, the Jaguar XK comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 61% less often than average) than the Ford Mustang (fails 37% less often than average).
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Ford Mustang | Jaguar XK | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | 1981–2026 | 1997–2020 |
| New cars registered in Europe | 55,766 (2010–2022) | 3,977 (2010–2019) |
| Licensed in the United Kingdom | 12,016 | 16,926 |
| On the road in the Netherlands | 7,283 | 603 |
| In traffic in Finland | 1,553 | 124 |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Ford Mustang | Jaguar XK | |
|---|---|---|
| UK MOT first-time pass rate | 83% | 81% |
| … against cars of the same age | +6% | +31% |
| New York safety inspections failed | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| … against cars of the same year | −37% | −61% |
| Illogical odometer records (NL) | 68.9% | — |
| US owner complaints | 9,231 | 46 |
| Most complaints about | Air bags | Vehicle speed control |
| Model year with most complaints | 2005 (705) | 2007 (15) |
| US recall campaigns | 81 | 10 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | 3,373 | 3,482 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | 95 | — |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Safety
| Ford Mustang | Jaguar XK | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ (2027) | — |
NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Ford Mustang | Jaguar XK | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | 9.1 l/100 km (2026) | 12.6 l/100 km (2014) |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol | 13.9 l/100 km | — |
| Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe | 266 g/km | — |
| Average power of new cars in Europe | 332 kW (445 hp) | 283 kW (380 hp) |
| Average mass in running order | 1,851 kg | 1,719 kg |
| Dutch list price when new (median) | €85,667 | €136,240 |
| Average odometer in Finland | 92,000 km | 115,000 km |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).