11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Thunderbird vs 200SX

Ford Thunderbird vs Nissan 200SX

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 1 like-for-like measure: the Ford Thunderbird leads on 0, the Nissan 200SX on 1.

Where each one leads

Ford Thunderbird

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Nissan 200SX

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 1998 Nissan 200SX uses 10.2 l/100 km, the 2005 Ford Thunderbird 13.0.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford ThunderbirdNissan 200SX
Model years in the US safety record1981–20051981–2001
Licensed in the United Kingdom251—
On the road in the Netherlands415247
In traffic in Finland167130

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford ThunderbirdNissan 200SX
New York safety inspections failed0.6%—
… against cars of the same year−66%—
US owner complaints2,357166
Most complaints aboutEngine and engine coolingAir bags
Model year with most complaints1993 (423)1995 (51)
US recall campaigns213
Manufacturer service bulletins890255
NHTSA defect investigations4011

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford ThunderbirdNissan 200SX
Official combined fuel use, Canada13.0 l/100 km (2005)10.2 l/100 km (1998)
Average odometer in Finland93,000 km205,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).