11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / CR-Z vs C30

Honda CR-Z vs Volvo C30

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Honda CR-Z leads on 3, the Volvo C30 on 1, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Honda CR-Z

  • Against cars of the same age, the Honda CR-Z comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 21% more often than average) than the Volvo C30 (passes 3% less often than average).
  • Fewer Honda CR-Z cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.5% against 2.8%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2016 Honda CR-Z uses 6.8 l/100 km, the 2013 Volvo C30 9.9.

Volvo C30

  • New Volvo C30 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 156 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 166 for the Honda CR-Z in 2022.

Too close to call: new York safety inspections failed, against cars of the same year.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Honda CR-ZVolvo C30
Model years in the US safety record2011–20162007–2014
New cars registered in Europe10,941 (2010–2022)50,101 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom3,56719,334
On the road in the Netherlands5778,166
In traffic in Finland1111,747

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Honda CR-ZVolvo C30
UK MOT first-time pass rate76%59%
… against cars of the same age+21%−3%
New York safety inspections failed2.7%2.9%
… against cars of the same year+12%+16%
Illogical odometer records (NL)1.5%2.8%
US owner complaints6849
Most complaints aboutAir bagsVisibility/wiper
Model year with most complaints2011 (38)2011 (14)
US recall campaigns34
Manufacturer service bulletins1631,401
NHTSA defect investigations6—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Honda CR-ZVolvo C30
NHTSA overall rating4★ (2016)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Honda CR-ZVolvo C30
Official combined fuel use, Canada6.8 l/100 km (2016)9.9 l/100 km (2013)
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe166 g/km156 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe107 kW (143 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,691 kg1,437 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€26,575€25,454
Average odometer in Finland179,000 km222,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).