11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / 9-3 vs C30

Saab 9-3 vs Volvo C30

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Saab 9-3 leads on 1, the Volvo C30 on 3.

Where each one leads

Saab 9-3

  • Against cars of the same age, the Saab 9-3 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 7% more often than average) than the Volvo C30 (passes 3% less often than average).

Volvo C30

  • Against cars of the same year, the Volvo C30 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 16% more often than average) than the Saab 9-3 (fails 26% more often than average).
  • Fewer Volvo C30 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (2.8% against 6.3%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2013 Volvo C30 uses 9.9 l/100 km, the 2009 Saab 9-3 10.4.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Saab 9-3Volvo C30
Model years in the US safety record1994–20122007–2014
New cars registered in Europe25,342 (2010–2017)50,101 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom28,14719,334
On the road in the Netherlands18,8498,166
In traffic in Finland7,9301,747

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Saab 9-3Volvo C30
UK MOT first-time pass rate62%59%
… against cars of the same age+7%−3%
New York safety inspections failed2.9%2.9%
… against cars of the same year+26%+16%
Illogical odometer records (NL)6.3%2.8%
US owner complaints1,34649
Most complaints aboutAir bagsVisibility/wiper
Model year with most complaints2003 (212)2011 (14)
US recall campaigns174
Manufacturer service bulletins1,7851,401
NHTSA defect investigations26—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Saab 9-3Volvo C30
Official combined fuel use, Canada10.4 l/100 km (2009)9.9 l/100 km (2013)
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe—156 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe101 kW (135 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,617 kg1,437 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€45,113€25,454
Average odometer in Finland274,000 km222,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).