11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / Eos vs C30

Volkswagen Eos vs Volvo C30

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Volkswagen Eos leads on 3, the Volvo C30 on 1.

Where each one leads

Volkswagen Eos

  • Against cars of the same age, the Volkswagen Eos comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 9% more often than average) than the Volvo C30 (passes 3% less often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Volkswagen Eos comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 15% less often than average) than the Volvo C30 (fails 16% more often than average).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2015 Volkswagen Eos uses 9.5 l/100 km, the 2013 Volvo C30 9.9.

Volvo C30

  • Fewer Volvo C30 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (2.8% against 4.3%).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Volkswagen EosVolvo C30
Model years in the US safety record2005–20172007–2014
New cars registered in Europe37,265 (2010–2020)50,101 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom9,95019,334
On the road in the Netherlands3,4388,166
In traffic in Finland1841,747

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Volkswagen EosVolvo C30
UK MOT first-time pass rate65%59%
… against cars of the same age+9%−3%
New York safety inspections failed2.0%2.9%
… against cars of the same year−15%+16%
Illogical odometer records (NL)4.3%2.8%
US owner complaints42549
Most complaints aboutAir bagsVisibility/wiper
Model year with most complaints2012 (94)2011 (14)
US recall campaigns74
Manufacturer service bulletins7,6761,401
NHTSA defect investigations15—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Volkswagen EosVolvo C30
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.5 l/100 km (2015)9.9 l/100 km (2013)
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe—156 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe93 kW (124 hp)—
Average mass in running order1,574 kg1,437 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€40,496€25,454
Average odometer in Finland190,000 km222,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).