11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large cars / XF vs Stinger

Jaguar XF vs Kia Stinger

Two large cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Jaguar XF leads on 4, the Kia Stinger on 0.

Where each one leads

Jaguar XF

  • Against cars of the same age, the Jaguar XF comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 8% more often than average) than the Kia Stinger (passes 3% more often than average).
  • Against cars of the same year, the Jaguar XF comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 28% less often than average) than the Kia Stinger (fails 6% more often than average).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2024 Jaguar XF uses 9.1 l/100 km, the 2023 Kia Stinger 11.9.
  • New Jaguar XF cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 168 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 247 for the Kia Stinger in 2022.

Kia Stinger

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Jaguar XFKia Stinger
Model years in the US safety record2009–20242018–2023
New cars registered in Europe154,473 (2010–2022)10,867 (2017–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom88,498—
On the road in the Netherlands2,218—
In traffic in Finland974100

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Jaguar XFKia Stinger
UK MOT first-time pass rate76%88%
… against cars of the same age+8%+3%
New York safety inspections failed1.4%1.3%
… against cars of the same year−28%+6%
Illogical odometer records (NL)6.0%—
US owner complaints395169
Most complaints aboutFuel/propulsion systemEngine
Model year with most complaints2010 (106)2018 (69)
US recall campaigns327
Manufacturer service bulletins6,844256
NHTSA defect investigations61

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Jaguar XFKia Stinger
NHTSA overall rating—5★ (2023)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Jaguar XFKia Stinger
Official combined fuel use, Canada9.1 l/100 km (2024)11.9 l/100 km (2023)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel6.8 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid6.7 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol9.8 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe168 g/km247 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe172 kW (231 hp)269 kW (361 hp)
Average mass in running order1,871 kg1,933 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€73,021—
Average odometer in Finland216,000 km92,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).