11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large cars / E-Class vs S90

Mercedes-Benz E-Class vs Volvo S90

Two large cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 6 like-for-like measures: the Mercedes-Benz E-Class leads on 2, the Volvo S90 on 3, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

  • Against cars of the same year, the Mercedes-Benz E-Class comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 46% less often than average) than the Volvo S90 (fails 26% less often than average).
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel hybrid Mercedes-Benz E-Class uses 6.5 l/100 km on the road, the Volvo S90 7.1.

Volvo S90

  • Against cars of the same age, the Volvo S90 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 4% more often than average) than the Mercedes-Benz E-Class (passes 2% less often than average).
  • Fewer Volvo S90 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.4% against 6.3%).
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol hybrid Volvo S90 uses 8.5 l/100 km on the road, the Mercedes-Benz E-Class 9.6.

Too close to call: official CO₂ of new cars in Europe (g/km).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Mercedes-Benz E-ClassVolvo S90
Model years in the US safety record1992–20081991–2025
New cars registered in Europe1,118,006 (2010–2022)36,779 (2016–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom213,1267,535
On the road in the Netherlands41,7011,987
In traffic in Finland42,6543,514

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Mercedes-Benz E-ClassVolvo S90
UK MOT first-time pass rate86%88%
… against cars of the same age−2%+4%
New York safety inspections failed1.0%1.0%
… against cars of the same year−46%−26%
Illogical odometer records (NL)6.3%1.4%
US owner complaints29869
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemUnknown or other
Model year with most complaints2003 (45)1998 (25)
US recall campaigns913
Manufacturer service bulletins1392,421
NHTSA defect investigations148

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Mercedes-Benz E-ClassVolvo S90
NHTSA overall rating5★ (2023)—

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Mercedes-Benz E-ClassVolvo S90
Official combined fuel use, Canada—9.2 l/100 km (2025)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid6.5 l/100 km7.1 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel6.7 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid9.6 l/100 km8.5 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol14.7 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe121 g/km120 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe167 kW (224 hp)185 kW (249 hp)
Average mass in running order1,970 kg1,953 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€72,621€71,240
Average odometer in Finland294,000 km170,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).