Where each one leads
Nissan Juke
- Against cars of the same year, the Nissan Juke comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 12% more often than average) than the Suzuki SX4 (fails 38% more often than average).
- On Canada's official test the most frugal 2017 Nissan Juke uses 8.0 l/100 km, the 2013 Suzuki SX4 8.4.
- Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol hybrid Nissan Juke uses 6.1 l/100 km on the road, the Suzuki SX4 6.4.
Suzuki SX4
- Against cars of the same age, the Suzuki SX4 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes as often as average) than the Nissan Juke (passes 6% less often than average).
- Fewer Suzuki SX4 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.8% against 2.9%).
- New Suzuki SX4 cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 128 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 133 for the Nissan Juke in 2022.
- Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Suzuki SX4 uses 6.6 l/100 km on the road, the Nissan Juke 7.2.
Too close to call: NHTSA overall safety rating.
Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare
At a glance
| Nissan Juke | Suzuki SX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Model years in the US safety record | 2011–2017 | 2000–2013 |
| New cars registered in Europe | 953,718 (2010–2022) | 365,949 (2010–2022) |
| Licensed in the United Kingdom | 412,852 | 59,073 |
| On the road in the Netherlands | 22,957 | 27,929 |
| In traffic in Finland | 5,268 | 4,027 |
EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).
Reliability and problems
| Nissan Juke | Suzuki SX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| UK MOT first-time pass rate | 71% | 71% |
| … against cars of the same age | −6% | average |
| New York safety inspections failed | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| … against cars of the same year | +12% | +38% |
| Illogical odometer records (NL) | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| US owner complaints | 478 | 312 |
| Most complaints about | Engine | Air bags |
| Model year with most complaints | 2011 (153) | 2008 (101) |
| US recall campaigns | 7 | 9 |
| Manufacturer service bulletins | 805 | 53 |
| NHTSA defect investigations | — | 5 |
Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).
Safety
| Nissan Juke | Suzuki SX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall rating | 4★ (2016) | 4★ (2014) |
NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).
Fuel, emissions and price
| Nissan Juke | Suzuki SX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Official combined fuel use, Canada | 8.0 l/100 km (2017) | 8.4 l/100 km (2013) |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol | 7.2 l/100 km | 6.6 l/100 km |
| Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid | 6.1 l/100 km | 6.4 l/100 km |
| Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe | 133 g/km | 128 g/km |
| Average power of new cars in Europe | 82 kW (110 hp) | 92 kW (123 hp) |
| Average mass in running order | 1,293 kg | 1,333 kg |
| Dutch list price when new (median) | €27,091 | €25,697 |
| Average odometer in Finland | 138,000 km | 164,000 km |
Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).