11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Small SUVs / C-Max vs SX4

Ford C-Max vs Suzuki SX4

Two small SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Ford C-Max leads on 2, the Suzuki SX4 on 2, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Ford C-Max

  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2018 Ford C-Max uses 5.9 l/100 km, the 2013 Suzuki SX4 8.4.
  • New Ford C-Max cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 105 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 128 for the Suzuki SX4 in 2022.

Suzuki SX4

  • Against cars of the same year, the Suzuki SX4 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 38% more often than average) than the Ford C-Max (fails 54% more often than average).
  • Fewer Suzuki SX4 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.8% against 2.9%).

Too close to call: MOT pass rate against cars of the same age.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford C-MaxSuzuki SX4
Model years in the US safety record2008–20182000–2013
New cars registered in Europe595,442 (2010–2022)365,949 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom102,68659,073
On the road in the Netherlands23,67227,929
In traffic in Finland2,9724,027

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford C-MaxSuzuki SX4
UK MOT first-time pass rate70%71%
… against cars of the same age+2%average
New York safety inspections failed3.3%3.4%
… against cars of the same year+54%+38%
Illogical odometer records (NL)2.9%1.8%
US owner complaints372312
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemAir bags
Model year with most complaints2013 (187)2008 (101)
US recall campaigns129
Manufacturer service bulletins57553
NHTSA defect investigations75

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford C-MaxSuzuki SX4
NHTSA overall rating—4★ (2014)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford C-MaxSuzuki SX4
Official combined fuel use, Canada5.9 l/100 km (2018)8.4 l/100 km (2013)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—6.4 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol—6.6 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe105 g/km128 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe—92 kW (123 hp)
Average mass in running order1,403 kg1,333 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€29,420€25,697
Average odometer in Finland180,000 km164,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).