11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Small SUVs / C-Max vs Juke

Ford C-Max vs Nissan Juke

Two small SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 5 like-for-like measures: the Ford C-Max leads on 3, the Nissan Juke on 1, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Ford C-Max

  • Against cars of the same age, the Ford C-Max comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 2% more often than average) than the Nissan Juke (passes 6% less often than average).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2018 Ford C-Max uses 5.9 l/100 km, the 2017 Nissan Juke 8.0.
  • New Ford C-Max cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 105 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 133 for the Nissan Juke in 2022.

Nissan Juke

  • Against cars of the same year, the Nissan Juke comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 12% more often than average) than the Ford C-Max (fails 54% more often than average).

Too close to call: dutch odometer readings judged illogical.

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford C-MaxNissan Juke
Model years in the US safety record2008–20182011–2017
New cars registered in Europe595,442 (2010–2022)953,718 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom102,686412,852
On the road in the Netherlands23,67222,957
In traffic in Finland2,9725,268

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford C-MaxNissan Juke
UK MOT first-time pass rate70%71%
… against cars of the same age+2%−6%
New York safety inspections failed3.3%2.6%
… against cars of the same year+54%+12%
Illogical odometer records (NL)2.9%2.9%
US owner complaints372478
Most complaints aboutElectrical systemEngine
Model year with most complaints2013 (187)2011 (153)
US recall campaigns127
Manufacturer service bulletins575805
NHTSA defect investigations7—

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Ford C-MaxNissan Juke
NHTSA overall rating—4★ (2016)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford C-MaxNissan Juke
Official combined fuel use, Canada5.9 l/100 km (2018)8.0 l/100 km (2017)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol—7.2 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid—6.1 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe105 g/km133 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe—82 kW (110 hp)
Average mass in running order1,403 kg1,293 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€29,420€27,091
Average odometer in Finland180,000 km138,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).