11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Sports cars / 9-3 vs C70

Saab 9-3 vs Volvo C70

Two sports cars, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Saab 9-3 leads on 3, the Volvo C70 on 1.

Where each one leads

Saab 9-3

  • Against cars of the same age, the Saab 9-3 comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 7% more often than average) than the Volvo C70 (passes 2% more often than average).
  • Fewer Saab 9-3 cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (6.3% against 6.9%).
  • On Canada's official test the most frugal 2009 Saab 9-3 uses 10.4 l/100 km, the 2013 Volvo C70 11.0.

Volvo C70

  • Against cars of the same year, the Volvo C70 comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 21% less often than average) than the Saab 9-3 (fails 26% more often than average).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Saab 9-3Volvo C70
Model years in the US safety record1994–20121992–2014
New cars registered in Europe25,342 (2010–2017)13,035 (2010–2021)
Licensed in the United Kingdom28,1475,735
On the road in the Netherlands18,8495,546
In traffic in Finland7,930708

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Saab 9-3Volvo C70
UK MOT first-time pass rate62%60%
… against cars of the same age+7%+2%
New York safety inspections failed2.9%1.9%
… against cars of the same year+26%−21%
Illogical odometer records (NL)6.3%6.9%
US owner complaints1,346196
Most complaints aboutAir bagsStructure
Model year with most complaints2003 (212)2000 (26)
US recall campaigns1710
Manufacturer service bulletins1,7853,066
NHTSA defect investigations2610

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Saab 9-3Volvo C70
Official combined fuel use, Canada10.4 l/100 km (2009)11.0 l/100 km (2013)
Average power of new cars in Europe101 kW (135 hp)169 kW (227 hp)
Average mass in running order1,617 kg1,717 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€45,113€57,430
Average odometer in Finland274,000 km224,000 km

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).