11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Small SUVs / Kuga vs Range Rover Evoque

Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 7 like-for-like measures: the Ford Kuga leads on 6, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque on 1.

Where each one leads

Ford Kuga

  • Fewer Ford Kuga cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (1.8% against 5.7%).
  • New Ford Kuga cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 84 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 138 for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque in 2022.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol hybrid Ford Kuga uses 6.2 l/100 km on the road, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 10.6.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel Ford Kuga uses 6.1 l/100 km on the road, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 7.5.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the petrol Ford Kuga uses 7.6 l/100 km on the road, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 10.3.
  • Measured by the cars' own fuel meters, the diesel hybrid Ford Kuga uses 6.1 l/100 km on the road, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 7.7.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Against cars of the same age, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comes out better at its first MOT test (passes 7% more often than average) than the Ford Kuga (passes 3% more often than average).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Ford KugaLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
Model years in the US safety record—2011–2026
New cars registered in Europe1,252,947 (2010–2022)360,203 (2011–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom376,999226,984
On the road in the Netherlands58,60812,404
In traffic in Finland9,889—

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Ford KugaLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
UK MOT first-time pass rate80%84%
… against cars of the same age+3%+7%
New York safety inspections failed—1.0%
… against cars of the same year—−33%
Illogical odometer records (NL)1.8%5.7%
US owner complaints—393
Most complaints about—Engine
Model year with most complaints—2015 (64)
US recall campaigns—26
Manufacturer service bulletins—5,278
NHTSA defect investigations—14

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Fuel, emissions and price

Ford KugaLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
Official combined fuel use, Canada—10.5 l/100 km (2026)
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid6.2 l/100 km10.6 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel6.1 l/100 km7.5 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, petrol7.6 l/100 km10.3 l/100 km
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid6.1 l/100 km7.7 l/100 km
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe84 g/km138 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe110 kW (147 hp)139 kW (187 hp)
Average mass in running order1,745 kg2,027 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€43,896€72,976
Average odometer in Finland142,000 km—

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).