11,145,731 US VINs16,875,657 Dutch plates3,603,918 businesses in 233 countries
English
AfrikaansAzərbaycancaBahasa IndonesiaBahasa MelayuCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEnglishEspañolFilipinoFrançaisGaeilgeHrvatskiÍslenskaItalianoKiswahiliLatviešuLietuviųMagyarMaltiNederlandsNorskOʻzbekchaPolskiPortuguês (Brasil)Português (Portugal)RomânăShqipSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSrpskiSuomiSvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάБеларускаяБългарскиКыргызчаҚазақшаМакедонскиМонголРусскийУкраїнськаქართულიՀայերենעבריתاردوالعربيةفارسیनेपालीहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்සිංහලไทยລາວမြန်မာខ្មែរ한국어日本語简体中文繁體中文
Check a VIN
CarsLore / Compare / Large SUVs / Range Rover Evoque vs CX-9

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Mazda CX-9

Two large SUVs, compared on the same official records: MOT and inspection results, safety ratings, fuel use, recalls and owner complaints. 4 like-for-like measures: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque leads on 3, the Mazda CX-9 on 0, 1 too close to call.

Where each one leads

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Against cars of the same year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comes out better in New York safety inspections (fails 33% less often than average) than the Mazda CX-9 (fails 1% more often than average).
  • Fewer Land Rover Range Rover Evoque cars in the Netherlands carry an illogical odometer record (5.7% against 17.3%).
  • New Land Rover Range Rover Evoque cars registered in Europe in 2022 average 138 g/km of CO₂ on the WLTP test, against 207 for the Mazda CX-9 in 2022.

Mazda CX-9

Ahead on none of the like-for-like measures.

Too close to call: official combined fuel use, Canada (l/100 km).

Only measures that do not depend on how many cars were sold: pass and failure rates against cars of the same age, ratings, fuel use and CO₂. How we compare

At a glance

Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueMazda CX-9
Model years in the US safety record2011–20262007–2023
New cars registered in Europe360,203 (2011–2022)1,860 (2010–2022)
Licensed in the United Kingdom226,984—
On the road in the Netherlands12,404195

EEA new-car registrations (CC BY 4.0) · DVLA licensed vehicles (OGL v3.0) · RDW (CC0) · Traficom (CC BY 4.0) · generations: Wikidata (CC0).

Reliability and problems

Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueMazda CX-9
UK MOT first-time pass rate84%—
… against cars of the same age+7%—
New York safety inspections failed1.0%1.6%
… against cars of the same year−33%+1%
Illogical odometer records (NL)5.7%17.3%
US owner complaints3931,440
Most complaints aboutEngineService brakes
Model year with most complaints2015 (64)2012 (221)
US recall campaigns2613
Manufacturer service bulletins5,2785,233
NHTSA defect investigations1415

Complaint, recall and bulletin counts grow with the number of cars sold and are not adjusted for it. UK MOT: DVSA anonymised MOT results (OGL v3.0); New York: DMV inspections; complaints, recalls, bulletins and investigations: NHTSA (public domain); odometer: RDW (CC0).

Safety

Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueMazda CX-9
NHTSA overall rating—5★ (2023)

NHTSA New Car Assessment Program, most recent rated model year (public domain).

Fuel, emissions and price

Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueMazda CX-9
Official combined fuel use, Canada10.5 l/100 km (2026)10.5 l/100 km (2023)
Real-world use in Europe, diesel hybrid7.7 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, diesel7.5 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol hybrid10.6 l/100 km—
Real-world use in Europe, petrol10.3 l/100 km—
Official CO₂ of new cars in Europe138 g/km207 g/km
Average power of new cars in Europe139 kW (187 hp)—
Average mass in running order2,027 kg1,920 kg
Dutch list price when new (median)€72,976€57,995

Canada: NRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, most frugal version of the latest year (OGL Canada). Europe: EEA monitoring of new-car CO₂ and on-board fuel meters (OBFCM), CC BY 4.0. Price: RDW catalogue price (CC0). Finland: Traficom (CC BY 4.0).